| 摘要: |
| 科技特派员制度源于福建省南平市的农业科技服务创新实践，逐渐成为一种全国性的农业推广模式，在20多年的发展中不断完善并创新机制，在我国脱贫攻坚、乡村振兴中发挥了积极作用。福建省科技特派员工作一直走在全国前列。文章总结了福建省科技特派员发展现状及成效，从科技服务精准对接、拓展服务外延与内涵、组团服务全产业链、科技服务市场化等方面分析其机制创新，并从科技人员、服务对象、政府主管部门等三方有机协同的角度，提出完善科技特派员机制创新的对策建议。 |
| 关键词: 科技特派员 农业科技服务 机制创新 全产业链 服务市场化 |
| DOI：10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20230209 |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:福建省属公益类基本科研专项“创新农业科技推广内容和传播模式研究”(2021R1033005)；福建省科技创新智库项目“福建茶产业全产业链发展科技支撑体系及产业集群发展对策研究”（FJKX-A2115）；福建省属公益类基本科研专项“新形势下福建休闲农业转型升级策略研究——以研学、康养为分析对象”（2022R1033006） |
|
| RESEARCH ON INNOVATION MECHANISM OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COMMISSIONER——TAKING FUJIAN PROVINCE AS AN EXAMPLE |
|
Liu Xinyong1, Chen Zhifeng1, Lin Guohua1, Huang Aiping1, Chi Lili2, Wu Jingcai3, Zhang Li4
|
|
1.Institute of Agricultural Economy and Scientific and Technological Information, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350003, Fujian, China;2.Science and Technology Service Office of Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences，Fuzhou 350003, Fujian, China;3.Institute of Agricultural Digital Research, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350003, Fujian, China;4.Songxi Science and Technology Information Research Institute，Nanping 353500，Fujian, China
|
| Abstract: |
| The science and technology commissioner system originates from the innovative practice of agricultural science and technology services in Nanping city, Fujian province, and gradually becomes a national agricultural extension model. In the development of more than 20 years, it had continuously improved and innovated the mechanism, and had played a positive role in poverty alleviation and rural revitalization in China. The work of science and technology commissioners in Fujian province had always been at the forefront of the country. This study summarized the development status and achievements of science and technology commissioners in Fujian province, analyzed its innovation mechanism from the aspects of precise docking of science and technology services, expanding the extension and connotation of services, organizing the whole industry chain services, and service marketization, and put forward countermeasures and suggestions to improve the science and technology commissioner system from the perspective of scientific and technological personnel, service objects, government departments in charge and other tripartite participants. |
| Key words: science and technology commissioner agricultural science and technology services mechanism innovation whole industry chain service marketization |
