公私合作农地整理项目的博弈分析：一个分析框架

GAME ANALYSIS OF LAND CONSOLIDATION PROJECTS BASED ON PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS: AN ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK

关键词:  农地整理 公私合作 博弈 土地利用

Key words:  land consolidation  public private partnerships  game  land use

摘要:

在界定公私合作农地整理项目模式的基础上，采用博弈分析法，分析公私合作农地整理项目参与主体的行为目标，探究公私合作农地整理项目中的政府与企业、企业与农村集体组织、企业与农户的博弈关系。研究结果表明，公私合作农地整理项目参与主体的行为目标存在差异； 协调政府追求社会福利最大化与企业追求利润最大化的目标冲突可提高项目效率； 协调企业与农村集体组织对促进合作有正向影响； 农户参与对提高农户项目的满意度有显著意义； 政府单一财政投资存在低效率现象，企业单独投资可能导致社会福利损失，政府和企业合作有利于提高农地整理项目的投资效率； 政府和企业的合作均衡受各自保留效用的影响，企业与农村集体组织合作投资的初始投入成本对合作具有正向作用； 超额收益分配是否合理，影响企业与农村集体组织双方的策略选择，而初始投入成本和违约赔偿金额对农户与企业的合作关系有正向影响。

Abstract:

Based on the definition of public-private partnerships in the agricultural land consolidation project mode, this paper employed the game analysis method, and analyzed the behavioral targeting of the participants involved in the agricultural land consolidation projects of public-private partnerships. And then it explored the game-relationship between government and enterprises, enterprises and rural collective organizations, businesses and farmers in the land consolidation projects based on the public-private partnerships. The results indicated that the targets of participants in land consolidation projects based on the public-private partnerships were different. The coordination of the conflict between the government's aim of social welfare maximization and enterprise's objective of profit maximization could improve the project efficiency. The coordination of the rural collective organization and enterprise had a positive impact on promoting cooperation. And the farmers joining in the project can improve the satisfaction of the project. The results also showed that the efficiency was low when projects were only financed by government. The enterprise investment alone could result in loss of social welfare. The cooperation between government and enterprise can improve the investment efficiency of land consolidation projects. The equilibrium of cooperation between government and enterprise was affected by the reservation utility. Initial investment of the enterprises and rural collective organizations had a positive effect. The distribution of over benefits between the partners affected the select of strategies. The initial investment cost and the amount of liquidated damages of between farmers and enterprises has positive impact on the cooperation relationship.