| 摘要: |
| ［目的］以中原城市群9个地市为研究对象，利用1998~2014年间面板数据，探索较小范围内耕地资源诅咒假说的存在性及影响因素，并提出适合区域实际的差别化管理政策，为扭转区域发展不平衡局面提供参考。［方法］利用耕地资源诅咒系数划分为不同的诅咒区，建立空间递归面板数据模型测算各诅咒区差别化影响因素。［结果］中原城市群9个地市中，平顶山、新乡、许昌、漯河和开封均存在不同程度的耕地资源诅咒现象，济源、焦作、洛阳属于潜在诅咒区，郑州属于完全无诅咒区。［结论］针对各诅咒区影响机制的不同，提出完全无诅咒区应进一步提高耕地集约利用度，强化对占地少、效益好的高新技术产业的引进力度，加快转移劳动密集型产业； 潜在诅咒区可在政策允许范围内适当释放耕地用于发展第二产业，应促进产业转型升级，走新型工业化道路； 轻度诅咒区应加大城市间交流协作，积极承接产业转移，带动区域经济发展； 严重诅咒区应限制建设用地开发，加强生态环境保护，重点发展第三产业。 |
| 关键词: 耕地数量 经济增长 资源诅咒 空间异质性 中原城市群 |
| DOI：10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20171005 |
| 分类号:F301.0 |
| 基金项目:国家社会科学基金“空间异质性视角下人口城镇化与土地城镇化的互动机理与政策优化研究”（16CJY045）、“基于耕地资源外部性价值空间异质性的差别化生态补偿机制研究”（15CJY013）； 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金“土地城镇化与人口城镇化的非均衡性、空间异质性及其耦合关系——中原城市群的实证”（15YJC630011）； 河南省高等学校重点科研项目计划“空间异质性视角下人口城镇化与土地城镇化的互动机理与政策优化研究”（17A630075）;河南省高校科技创新人才支持计划（人文社科类）资助成果（2018-cx-012） |
|
| SPATIAL DIFFERENCE OF THE CULTIVATED LAND RESOURCE CURSE AND THE DIFFERENTIAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGY——TAKING THE CENTRAL HENAN URBAN AGGLOMERATION AS AN EXAMPLE |
|
Chen Yu1, Chen Yinrong2
|
|
1.Zhengzhou Institute of Light Industry School of Economics and Management, Zhengzhou, Henan 450002, China;2.Huazhong Agricultural University School of Public Administration, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China
|
| Abstract: |
| Based on the panel data from 1998 to 2014，this paper used coefficient of the resource curse and space recursive panel data model to study the existence and conduction mechanism in the central Henan urban agglomeration, then put forward actual management policy suitable for the regional differentiation, so as to reverse the unbalanced regional development situation. It used coefficient of the resource curse to divide cultivated land resource curse area and established space recursive panel data model to measure differentiation factors in different curse area. The results indicated that the relationship between the cultivated land resources and economic growth was relatively inadequate. There were different degrees of cultivated land resource curse in Pingdingshan, Xinxiang, Xuchang, Luohe and Kaifeng. In addition, Jiyuan, Jiaozuo and Luoyang were located in the potential curse area, while Zhengzhou belonged to non-curse district. According to the different transmission mechanism, it put forward differentiation development suggestions, such as improving the degree of intensive utilization of cultivated land, accelerating the transfer of labor-intensive industries in non-curse district, promoting industrial transformation and upgrading, increasing urban agglomeration communication and cooperation, promoting the surplus labor transfer in light curse district, limiting the development of the construction land, strengthening ecology environment protection, and developing the tertiary industry in severe curse area. |
| Key words: arable land quantity economic growth resource curse spatial heterogeneity central Henan urban agglomeration |
