| 摘要: |
| ［目的］为将分散的农民纳入生态环境治理体系，实现农村地区可持续环境管理模式的转型与创新。［方法］在梳理认知型社会资本对农民环境治理参与行为运作逻辑的基础上，基于四川省崇州市的调研数据，利用多项Logit模型，以秸秆资源化利用方式为例，对比分析个体与村域层面认知型社会资本对农民环境治理参与行为的影响。［结果］认知型社会资本能够解释农民秸秆处理方式的差异。个体认知型社会资本对农民秸秆资源化利用方式的选择具有显著正向影响，而村域认知型社会资本的负向影响则不显著。就个体层面而言，制度信任、规范和亲环境价值观均显著促进农民采用秸秆资源化利用方式，而合作愿景的影响则显著为负。就村域层面而言，公共信任和亲环境价值观均显著负向影响农民的秸秆还田行为，而规范的影响则显著为正。［结论］认知型社会资本对农民秸秆处理方式的选择差异具有强大解释力，能够有助于农村生态环境问题的缓解。 |
| 关键词: 农民认知型社会资本环境治理参与行为秸秆资源化利用 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号:F3232 |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年项目“集约化畜禽养殖有机废弃物循环利用的减碳补偿机理及政策设计研究：基于‘养治统一’与‘养治分离’视角”（71703051）；国家自然科学基金重点项目“现代农业科技发展创新体系研究” （71333006）教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“绿色化的重大意义及其实现途径研究”（15JZD014）；中宣部文化名家暨“四个一批”人才项目：中国农村绿色发展问题研究、中央高校基本科研业务费项目“畜禽养殖污染防控生态服务价值的形成机理与实现途径研究”（2662017QD009）；青海省软科学项目“青海省县域科技创新模式及实施方案研究”（2018 ZJ-609） |
|
| COGNITIVE SOCIAL CAPITAL AND FAMERS′ ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE PARTICIPATION BEHAVIOR*——TAKING RESOURCE UTILIZATION OF STRAW AS AN EXAMPLE |
|
He Peipei1,2, Zhang Junbiao1,2※, He Ke1,2, Zeng Yangmei1,2
|
|
1. College of Economics & Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China;2. Hubei Rural Development Research Center, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China
|
| Abstract: |
| In order to integrate scattered farmers into the ecological environment management system and realize the transformation and innovation of sustainable environmental management mode in rural areas. Based on the research logic of cognitive social capital in farmers′ environmental governance participation behavior, and the survey data of Chongzhou city, Sichuan province, this paper employed multiple Logit models to compare and analyze the influences of cognitive social capital at the individual and village levels on farmers′ participation in environmental governance by taking straw resource utilization as an example. The results showed that cognitive social capital helped to explain the differences in farmers′ straw treatment methods. Cognitive social capital at the individual level had a significantly positive impact on the choice of farmers′ straw resource utilization, while the negative impact of cognitive social capital at the village level was not significant. At the individual level, institutional trust, norms and pro environmental values had significantly positive impacts on farmers′ adoption of straw resource utilization, while the impact of the cooperative vision had been significantly negative. At the village level, public trust and pro environmental values had significantly negative impacts on farmers′ straw returning behavior, while the normative impact was significantly positive. So, cognitive social capital has a strong explanatory power for the choice of farmers′ straw treatment methods, thus contributing to the relief of rural ecological environment problems. |
| Key words: famers cognitive social capital environmental governance participation behavior straw resource utilization |
