• 首页 | 主办单位 | 期刊简介 | 编委会 | 作者指南 | 刊物订阅 | 下载中心 | 联系我们 | English | 期刊界
引用本文:蒋亮,罗静,张春燕,田玲玲,陈国磊,吴益坤.基于主体功能定位的湖北省县域乡村性空间分异研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(8):58~66
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 714次   下载 291 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
基于主体功能定位的湖北省县域乡村性空间分异研究
蒋亮1,2罗静1,2※张春燕1,2田玲玲1,2陈国磊1,2吴益坤1,2
1.华中师范大学地理过程分析与模拟湖北省重点实验室,湖北武汉430079; 2.华中师范大学城市与环境科学学院,湖北武汉430079
摘要:
[目的]确立与主体功能区定位相协调的乡村发展类型与乡村政策,是促进城乡融合、乡村振兴的重要措施。[方法]以湖北省县域为空间单元,构建乡村性评价指标体系,并基于三次产业的产值结构,划分县域的乡村发展类型。[结果](1)2016年湖北省县域乡村性指数相对较高,乡村性呈现出东低西高的空间分布格局。乡村发展类型可划分为农业主导型、工业主导型、商旅服务型和均衡发展型,分别占县域总数的2529%、161%、1071%和4828%。(2)重点开发区的乡村类型以工业主导型和商旅服务型为主,乡村类型主要是城镇化和工业化带动,市场、资本推动力和农民的自主选择突出; 农产品主产区和重点生态功能区的乡村类型均以农业主导型和均衡发展型为主,不同的是农产品主产区的农业自然和生产条件优越、农耕文化根植,农业政策扶植,乡村类型是由农业现代化和产业化推动; 重点生态功能区乡村类型受资源环境约束、经济基础及行政干预的推动。[结论]三大主体功能区下的乡村类型及驱动机制存在差异,并提出不同乡村振兴发展的政策建议。
关键词:  乡村性乡村发展类型县域主体功能区湖北省
DOI:
分类号:F3203
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目“江汉平原乡村服务中心地网络化发展研究” (41871176)、“农村公共医疗设施服务质量均等化与优化研究”(41801177); 国家社会科学基金青年项目“林区振兴的IRT发展模式及其动态调适研究”(18CJY048); 华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费“江汉平原人地关系地域系统演化与乡村振兴战略研究”(CCNU18ZDPY09); 华中师范大学优秀博士学位论文培育计划项目(2019YBZZ004)
SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF RURALITY AT COUNTY LEVEL IN HUBEI PROVINCE BASED ON MAJOR FUNCTION ORIENTED ZONING LOCATION
Jiang Liang1,2, Luo Jing1,2※, Zhang Chunyan1,2, Tian Lingling1,2, Chen Guolei1,2, Wu Yikun1,2
1. Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis& Simulation Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, China;2. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, China
Abstract:
The establishment of rural development types and policy in line with major function oriented zoning is an important measure to promote the integration of urban and rural development and achieve rural revitalization. Based on the county level as the basic unit of space, the rurality evaluation index system of 87 counties in Hubei province was constructed in 2016, and based on output value structure of three industries, the types of rural development in the counties were divided. The results showed that: (1) In 2016, the rurality index in the counties of Hubei province was relatively high, and the rurality index of the counties in the western area was higher than those of the eastern area. The types of rural development in counties could be divided into four types, namely, agriculture dominated, industrial oriented, business service oriented and balanced development, accounting for 25.29%, 16.1%, 10.71% and 48.28% of the total number of counties, respectively. (2) The rural development types in prioritized development zones were industrial oriented and business service oriented, and mainly driven by urbanization and industrialization. The market, capital and farmers′ independent choices were prominent. The rural types in main agricultural zones and key ecological functional zones had been dominated by agriculture oriented and balanced development rural. The difference was that the natural and agricultural production conditions in main agricultural zones were superior, the farming culture was rooted, and the agricultural policies were supported. Therefore, rural types were promoted by agricultural modernization and industrial modernization. The rural types in key ecological functional zones were promoted by policies, administrative intervention, resources and environment constraints. Finally, due to the differences of the rural types and driving mechanism, the paper put forward different development proposals for different rural types in three major function oriented zoning.
Key words:  rurality  types of rural development  county level  major function oriented zoning  Hubei province
版权所有:  您是本站第    位访问者
主管单位:中华人民共和国农业农村部 主办单位:中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所
中国农业绿色发展研究会 地址:北京市海淀区中关村南大街12号
电话:010-82109628、82109647 电子邮件:quhuabjb@caas.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备11039015号