摘要: |
目的 立足乡村振兴战略关于“生态宜居”的总要求,基于“三生”功能界定农村人居环境内涵,构建农村人居环境质量评价指标体系,探索农村人居环境与区域经济的内在协调机制及其时空演变规律,对农村人居环境质量及其与区域经济发展协调程度进行定量分析,为政府部门高水平推进农村人居环境整治、构建城乡协调发展格局提供决策依据。方法 文章运用熵权TOPSIS模型测算2011—2019年我国30省(市、区)农村人居环境质量与区域经济发展指数,运用耦合协调度模型测算二者协调发展程度。结果 2011—2019年我国农村人居环境质量呈现逐步改善趋势,但总体水平仍然不高、优化空间很大;农村人居环境质量空间分异特征明显、地区间差距有进一步扩大的趋势;农村人居环境与区域经济发展协调程度普遍较低。结论 根据量化分析结果将30省(区、市)划分为经济超前型、趋于同步型、经济制约型和低质协调型4大类型,有针对性地提出优化策略。 |
关键词: 农村人居环境 农村环境 质量评价 乡村振兴 协调度 |
DOI:10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20211003 |
分类号:F329.9 |
基金项目:农业农村部软科学研究课题“互联网+农村社会事业思路与对策研究”(2020GM038) |
|
THE EVALUATION OF THE QUALITY OF RURAL HUMAN SETTLEMENTS AND ITS COORDINATION WITH REGIONAL ECONOMY IN CHINA BASED ON THE PRODUCTION-LIVING-ECOLOGICAL THEORY |
Liang Chen, Li Jianping, Li Junjie
|
Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
|
Abstract: |
According to the general requirements of the rural revitalization strategy for "ecological livability", this research aims to define the connotation of the rural human settlement environment based on the "production-living-ecological space" theory, establish the evaluation index system of rural human settlement environment, conduct a research on the environmental quality of rural human settlements and its coordination with regional economic development, so as to provide a scientific basis for the high-level promotion of the rural human settlement environment, and the regional urban-rural coordinated development pattern. Using the improved TOPSIS method based on information entropy, this research measured and graded the environmental quality of rural human settlements and the level of regional economic development in 30 provinces and cities in China from 2011 to 2019. Then it applied the coupling coordination model to measure and classify the coupling coordination. The results were listed as follows. From 2011 to 2019, though the quality of the rural human settlement environment had been significantly improved, yet there was still a lot of room for optimization. With significant regional differences and an increasing trend, the features of the spatial differentiation of were obvious. The coordination between rural human settlements and regional economic development was generally low. According to the analysis results, the 30 provinces and (cities, REGIONS) were divided into four types, relatively advanced economic, approaching coordination, economic contradiction and low-quality coordinated. Finally, it provides targeted optimization strategies according to the actual situation. |
Key words: rural human settlement rural environment quality evaluation rural revitalization coordination |