| 摘要: |
| 目的 宅基地盘活利用是保障农民财产权的重要举措，识别宅基地利用风险是稳慎推进宅基地制度改革的基本前提。为此，文章系统总结宅基地利用风险的研究成果，展望未来研究重点领域和发展方向，期望为农村宅基地利用风险的研究与政策制定提供参考。方法 基于CiteSpace5.7.R2的文献计量法，该文从宅基地利用风险识别、风险评价和风险防范全面梳理国内外研究进展。结果 （1）从风险识别看，宅基地利用过程中主要存在农民与集体权益受损的经济风险，社会保障不足与社会矛盾加剧的社会风险，耕地生态退化与生态景观损毁的生态风险，财政收入下滑与制度绩效受损的政治风险。（2）从风险评价看，既有文献主要围绕宅基地利用风险影响机制与风险等级评估展开分析。囿于研究区域、理论方法、指标选取与分析视角等的异质性，风险评价结果存在差异。（3）从风险防范看，宅基地利用风险研究，现已形成相关法律制度、集体组织机制、市场配套机制等多维研究趋势。结论 未来需重点关注全周期风险识别、多维度风险评价以及多主体风险防范等问题的研究。 |
| 关键词: 宅基地利用风险 风险识别 风险评价 风险防范 CiteSpace5.7.R2 |
| DOI：10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20240814 |
| 分类号:F301.24 |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金“西南地区农村闲置宅基地市场化风险识别、影响机制与配置路径研究”（42271280）；国家社会科学基金“三权分置改革中宅基地使用权经营性收转增值收益分配研究”（20BJY120） |
|
| RESEARCH REVIEW AND PROSPECTS FOR HOMESTEAD UTILIZATION RISK |
|
Wang Zhaolin1,2, Li Ran1, Wang Han3, Zhan Jiayi4
|
|
1.Chongqing Technology and Business University, Institute for Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Zone Development, Chongqing 400067, China;2.School of Public Administration, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China;3.International Business School, Yanshan College, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 271199, Shandong, China;4.School of Economics and Management, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
|
| Abstract: |
| Active utilization of residential land is an important measure to protect farmers' property rights, and identifying the risk of residential land utilization is the basic premise for promoting the reform of residential land system steadily. To this end, this research adopted the bibliometric method of CiteSpace5.7.R2 to systematically summarize the research results of homestead use risk, comprehensively reviewed the research progress at home and abroad from the perspective of homestead use risk identification, risk assessment and risk prevention, and looked forward to the future research key areas and development direction, hoping to provide references for the research and policy formulation of rural homestead use risk. The results were listed as follows. (1) From the point of view of risk identification, there were mainly economic risks of damage to farmers' and collective rights and interests, social risks of insufficient social security and intensified social contradictions, ecological risks of cultivated land ecological degradation and ecological landscape damage, and political risks of fiscal revenue decline and institutional performance damage in the process of homestead utilization. (2) From the perspective of risk evaluation, the existing literatures mainly focused on the research mechanism of homestead utilization risk and risk grade assessment. Due to the heterogeneity of research area, theoretical method, index selection and analysis perspective, the results of risk assessment were different. (3) From the perspective of risk prevention, the research on the risk of homestead utilization had formed a multi-dimensional research trend such as national legal system, collective organization mechanism, market supporting plan and active utilization procedure. So, in the future, it is necessary to focus on the research of the whole cycle risk identification, multi-dimensional risk assessment and multi-agent risk prevention. |
| Key words: homestead utilization risk risk identification risk assessment risk prevention CiteSpace5.7.R2 |
