| 摘要: |
| 目的 面对日趋激烈的国际市场竞争环境，厘清中国在全球农业价值链中的分工地位，对于进一步提升中国农业全球贸易地位和竞争力具有重要现实意义。方法 基于贸易增加值分析框架，文章利用1995—2018年的世界投入产出表数据，探究了中国和其他主要经济体的农业价值链分工地位及其演变特征。结果 （1）中国农业增加值出口份额快速增长，但主要以简单价值链活动为主，农业中间品出口占比较低，总体上仍处于全球农业价值链的中低端环节。（2）无论是前向参与率，抑或后向参与率，中国农业细分行业的全球价值链参与水平均较低，与欧美发达国家仍有一定差距。（3）中国农业细分行业的分工地位经历了不同程度的提升，“价值链低端锁定”困境得到了明显缓解，且对领先国家的追赶势头进一步增强，但农牧业和渔业依然存在“低参与率，低分工地位”的迹象。结论 应持续推进农业高水平对外开放，加快突破农业“卡脖子”短板，培育更多生产标准高、出口附加值高、品牌认可度高的农产品外贸型企业，形成以农业核心技术与农产品品牌质量为核心的新竞争优势。 |
| 关键词: 农业 全球价值链 低端锁定 分工地位 出口增加值 |
| DOI：10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20251211 |
| 分类号:F319.9 |
| 基金项目:国家社会科学基金学术社团学术研究项目“‘一带一路’沿线国家农业合作网络韧性提升机制与项目对策研究”（25SGC201）；国家社会科学基金项目“粮食和重要农产品有效供给保障能力与提升路径研究”（23BJY155）；中央财政计划专项“国家现代农业（柑橘）产业技术体系（MATS）专项经费”(CARS-26-06BY) |
|
| CHINA'S STATUS IN THE AGRICULTURAL GLOBAL VALUE CHAIN AND ITS INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON |
|
Fang Guozhu1,2, Ling Wenbo3, Qi Chunjie4
|
|
1Department of Economics, Party School of Zhejiang Provincial Committee of the CPC, Hangzhou 311121, Zhejiang, China;2Zhejiang Province " Double-Eight Strategy" Innovation Development Institute, Party School of Zhejiang Provincial Committee of the CPC, Hangzhou 311121, Zhejiang, China;3Yuhang Branch, Party School of Hangzhou Municipal Committee of CPC, Hangzhou 311121, Zhejiang, China;4College of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agriculture University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
|
| Abstract: |
| In the face of increasingly fierce international market competition environment, it is of great practical significance to clarify China's embedment degree and division of labor status in the agricultural global value chain(AGVC) for further enhancing China's agricultural international trade status and competitiveness. Based on the framework of trade added value analysis and the data of world input-output table from 1995 to 2018, this research explored the agricultural value chain status and its evolutionary characteristics of China and other major economies. The Results were listed as follows. (1) China's share of agricultural value-added exports was growing rapidly, but mainly dominated by simple value chain activities. Meanwhile, the proportion of China's agricultural intermediate exports was relatively low, and China was still in the middle and low end of AGVC. (2) Both in terms of forward and backward participation rates, the AGVC participation level of China's sub-sectors was relatively low, and there was still a massive gap with that of developed countries in Europe and the US. (3) China’s AGVC status improved to varying degrees, and the “low-end locking in the value chain” dilemma had been significantly alleviated, with further momentum to catch up with leading countries. However, agro-pastoralism and fisheries were still in a state of “low participation and low status”. Thus, China should continue to promote the high level of agricultural openness, accelerate the breakthrough of agricultural “neck” technology shortcomings, cultivate more agricultural export enterprises with high production standards, high value-added exports and high brand recognition, and form a new competitive advantage with core agricultural technology and brand quality. |
| Key words: agriculture global value chains low-end lock-in division of labor value added of exports |
