• 首页 | 主办单位 | 期刊简介 | 编委会 | 作者指南 | 刊物订阅 | 下载中心 | 联系我们 | English | 期刊界
引用本文:高云,詹慧龙,赵跃龙,李树君,矫健.国家现代农业示范区显著性分析[J].中国农业资源与区划,2016,37(2):103~113
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1492次   下载 856 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
国家现代农业示范区显著性分析
高云1, 詹慧龙2, 赵跃龙1, 李树君1, 矫健3
1.农业部规划设计研究院农业工程标准定额研究所,北京100125;2.农业部农村社会事业发展中心,北京100122;3.农业部规划设计研究院农业发展与投资研究所,北京100125
摘要:
为了更好地推进现代农业发展,农业部认定了153个国家现代农业示范区,积极为各区域现代农业树立样板。文章根据2009~2012年国家现代农业示范区与非示范区的数据对比看出示范区的发展基础明显好于非示范区,通过将示范区与非示范区分组,运用DID模型分析示范区显著性作用,最终得出示范区竞争力提升并非由示范区本身发展趋势所致,而是由政府认定示范区政策所致,更加肯定农业部认定示范区对示范区农业竞争力的推动作用。农业部认定为示范区之后,区域经济发展更为迅速,提升作用显著。而东、中、西、东北地区的显著性效果均不同。东、中、东北地区提升作用较西部地区明显,每个区域不同年份之间的提升作用也是不同的。但是,并非认定为示范区就是对区域农业竞争力提升是有利的,示范区的认定是政府政策作用的结果,如果全国各地的县(市)全部都认定为示范区,那么认定示范区也就失去了原有的作用与意义。
关键词:  国家现代农业示范区 竞争力 显著性
DOI:10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20160217
分类号:
基金项目:农业部规划设计研究院资助项目
RESEARCH ON SIGNIFICANCE OF NATIONAL MODERN AGRICULTURE DEMONSTRATION DISTRICT
Gao Yun1, Zhan Huilong2, Zhao Yuelong1, Li Shujun1, Jiao Jian3
1.Institute of agricultural engineering standard quota of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100125, China;2.Center for Development of Rural Social Undertakings, MOA, PRC, Beijing 100122, China;3.Institute of Agricultural Development and Investment of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Engineering, Beijing 100125, China
Abstract:
In order to promote the development of modern agriculture, 153 National Modern Agriculture Demonstration Districts (NMADD) are identified by Ministry of Agriculture, which play a positive role in setting up the mode for the regional modern agriculture. According to the comparative analysis between demonstration and non-demonstration zone in 2009 to 2012, this paper found that the development of the demonstration area was much better than the non-demonstration area. And then it used the DID model to analyze the competitiveness of NMADD, and concluded that the promotion of competitiveness of NMADD was not caused by the development trend of NMADD itself, but by government designating NMADD policy. It indicated that the identification by Ministry of Agriculture had made great effects in promoting the competitiveness of NMADD. The significant effects among eastern, central, west, northeast were different. The effects in eastern, central and northeast were more significant than that in the western region. The effects of each region in different years were also different. However, the NMADD was not good all the time for promoting regional agricultural competitiveness, because it will lose its original function and meaning if all the countries were identified as NMADD.
Key words:  national modern agriculture demonstration district  competitiveness  significance
版权所有:  您是本站第    位访问者
主管单位:中华人民共和国农业农村部 主办单位:中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所
中国农业绿色发展研究会 地址:北京市海淀区中关村南大街12号
电话:010-82109628、82109647 电子邮件:quhuabjb@caas.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备11039015号