• 首页 | 主办单位 | 期刊简介 | 编委会 | 作者指南 | 刊物订阅 | 下载中心 | 联系我们 | English | 期刊界
引用本文:聂学东.河北省乡村振兴战略与乡村旅游发展计划耦合研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2019,40(7):53~57
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 783次   下载 333 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
河北省乡村振兴战略与乡村旅游发展计划耦合研究
聂学东
河北青年管理干部学院,石家庄050031
摘要:
[目的]探讨乡村振兴战略和旅游发展的耦合关系,以期为乡村的可持续发展提供理论和实践支撑。[方法]以河北省为例,通过构建乡村振兴和乡村旅游发展系统,采用层次分析法确定权重,进而通过耦合模型计算两者的协调度。[结果](1)河北省各个市区的乡村振兴战略系统的得分介于0784 2~1572 3,其中石家庄的得分最高(1572 3),其次是邯郸(1404 8),邢台(1397 4),而承德的得分最低(0784 2); (2)乡村旅游系统的得分介于0768 7~0954 7,其中石家庄得分最高(0954 7),其次是廊坊(0927 6)、保定(0925 3),但就整体而言,河北省各个市区的乡村旅游发展水平差别较小; (3)河北省大部分市区的乡村振兴战略和乡村旅游发展的耦合协调度处于较高以上水平,其中石家庄和邢台的耦合协调度分别为0986 8和0923 2,处于高度耦合水平; 唐山(0849 5)、秦皇岛(0853 3)、邯郸(0881 9)、保定(0864 2)、张家口(0813 3)和廊坊(0890 4)处于较高耦合水平; 沧州(0764 4)和衡水(0726 8)处于中度耦合水平; 而承德为0695 5,处于低度耦合水平。[结论]分析河北省各市区乡村振兴和乡村旅游发展的耦合程度,对于全省乡村均衡持续发展具有重要作用。
关键词:  乡村振兴乡村旅游层次分析法耦合协调度河北省
DOI:
分类号:F327; F5927
基金项目:2018年度河北省社会科学发展研究课题“乡村旅游助力乡村全面振兴的机理与路径研究”(201803020224)
RESEARCH ON THE COUPLING OF RURAL REVITALIZATION STRATEGY AND RURAL TOURISM DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN HEBEI PROVINCE
Nie Xuedong
Hebei Youth Cadres Administrative College, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050031, China
Abstract:
This research aims to explore the coupling relationship between the strategy of rural revitalization and tourism development, so as to provide theoretical and practical support for the sustainable development of rural areas. Taking Hebei province as an example, this research constructed a rural development and tourism development system, determined the weights by using the analytic hierarchy process, and then calculated the degree of coordination between the two through a coupling model. The results were indicated as follows. Firstly, the scores of the rural revitalization strategy system in each urban area of Hebei province ranged from 0.7842 to 1.5723, with Shijiazhuang having the highest score (1.5723), followed by Handan (1.4048), Xingtai (1.3974), while Chengde scored the lowest (0.7842).Secondly, the score of the rural tourism system was from 0.7687 to 0.9547, among which Shijiazhuang had the highest score (0.9547), followed by Langfang (0.9276) and Baoding (0.9253), but overall, the development level of rural tourism in different urban areas of Hebei province was relatively small. Finally, the coupling coordination degree between rural revitalization strategy and rural tourism development in most urban areas of Hebei Province was at a relatively high level. The coupling coordination degrees between Shijiazhuang and Xingtai were 0.9868 and 0.9232, respectively, which were at a high level of coupling; Tangshan (0.8495), Qinhuangdao (0.8533), Handan (0.8819), Baoding (0.8642), Zhangjiakou (0.8133) and Langfang (0.8904) were at a higher level of coupling; Cangzhou (0.7644) and Hengshui (0.7268) were at moderate coupling level; while Chengde was 0.6955, at low level of coupling. The analysis of the coupling degree between rural revitalization and rural tourism development in each urban area of Hebei Province plays an important role in the balanced and sustainable development of rural villages in Hebei province.
Key words:  rural revitalization  countryside tourism  analytic hierarchy process  coupling coordination  Hebei province
版权所有:  您是本站第    位访问者
主管单位:中华人民共和国农业农村部 主办单位:中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所
中国农业绿色发展研究会 地址:北京市海淀区中关村南大街12号
电话:010-82109628、82109647 电子邮件:quhuabjb@caas.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备11039015号