中国传统规划布局理论与农业园区“规划五纲”之辨析

ANALYSIS OF CHINESE TRADITIONAL PLANNING AND "PLANNING FIVE CLASSES"

关键词:  农业园区 中国传统规划布局 风水理论 地理五诀 规划五纲

Key words:  agricultural park  Chinese traditional planning  Geomancy theory  five geography formulas  five planning classes

摘要:

目的］通过将传统规划布局理论中的“龙、砂、水、穴、向”五大要素，分别与农业园区规划中的大环境政策分析，地形地势定位，实地调研与自然、社会资源分析，空间规划以及产业规划要素进行对比分析，创新性提出“规划五纲”概念。［方法］运用交叉比较法，结合农业园区规划中“以人为本”的可持续发展的理念和传统哲学中关于“天人合一”理论，对中国传统村镇营建经验与农业园区规划进行比较研究。结合“地理五诀”相关知识，分析传统规划布局理论与农业园区规划要素之间的关系，并尝试运用到规划实例中去。［结果］解析了传统规划布局理论与农业园区规划要素之间的关系，以“龙、砂、水、穴、向”对应“政策定势、资源勘查、要素配置、空间布局和产业路线”，即在农业园区规划实践中，依托地理五诀，以龙作为政策定势的依据，以砂进行自然资源勘察分析，以水进行流动要素配置，以穴确定空间规划布局，以向规划产业特色路线。［结论］古为今用，实践创新，“规划五纲”在河南淅川福森丹江生态农业园区进行了规划实例验证，取得了较好的应用效果，对未来农业园区规划工作，具有有益的借鉴意义。

Abstract:

This paper put forward the concept of "Planning five classes" through comparing the traditional Chinese planning with modern agricultural park planning. There are five elements in Chinese traditional planning theory, i.e., "Dragon, sand, water, hole, direction", which can correspond to the elements in modern agriculture park planning, i.e., policy, geography, natural and social resources, space layout planning and industry planning. Combining the Chinese traditional planning theory, it analyzed the relationship between traditional layout theory and agricultural park planning, and then applied to the practical planning. The results showed that there were some corresponding relationships between traditional and modern planning, i.e., taking the "dragon" as the basis of policy making, the "sand" as natural resources, the "water" as factor allocation, the "hole" as spatial layout, and the "direction" as industry planning. And then, the concept was used for the planning of Fusen-Danjiang agricultural park, and had good application effect. The results can serve for the planning of modern agricultural industry park.