• 首页 | 主办单位 | 期刊简介 | 编委会 | 作者指南 | 刊物订阅 | 下载中心 | 联系我们 | English | 期刊界
引用本文:黄修杰,蔡勋,储霞玲,马力,左喆瑜.我国农业高质量发展评价指标体系构建与评估[J].中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(4):124~133
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 956次   下载 371 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
我国农业高质量发展评价指标体系构建与评估
黄修杰, 蔡勋, 储霞玲, 马力, 左喆瑜
广东省农业科学院农业经济与农村发展研究所/农业农村部华南都市农业重点实验室,广州510640
摘要:
[目的]农业高质量发展是实施质量兴农战略的总目标,是落实乡村振兴的重要举措。[方法]在系统阐释农业高质量发展内涵的基础上,文章构建了产品质量、产业效益、生产效率、经营者素质、国际竞争力、农民收入、绿色发展等7个维度23个指标的农业高质量评价指标体系,并基于2016年省际数据分析了我国农业高质量发展情况。[结果]除上海、山东以及天津等部分省市外,我国农业高质量发展水平整体偏低,且存在显著的地区差异,整体呈现东高西低的趋势,其中上海的综合得分最高,山西综合得分最低; 各省在产品质量、产业效益及国际竞争力维度的地区差距明显,而在经营者素质、生产效率、农民收入、绿色发展水平维度差异不显著。我国农业高质量发展与经济发展水平、城镇化发展水平显著正相关,其次人力资本和农业投资的增加也会有效提升我国农业高质量发展水平,而农业资源禀赋的影响并不显著。[结论]应充分发挥现代农业产业园的龙头效应,发挥地区农业比较优势、提高农产品国际竞争力,采取有效措施提高农民的文化素质,加强农业社会化服务体系建设提升地区农业生产效率,以促进我国农业的高质量发展。
关键词:  农业高质量发展指标体系综合评价区域差异
DOI:
分类号:F3033
基金项目:广东省级乡村振兴战略专项“广东省乡村振兴战略研究”(粤财农[2018]125号); 国家自然科学基金项目“农业绿色发展的政策干预与农户行为——基于拟随机实验的经验研究”(71803030)
INDEX CONSTRUCTION AND EVALUATION OF HIGH QUALITY DEVELOPMENT OF AGRICULTURE IN CHINA
Huang Xiujie, Cai Xun, Chu Xialing, Ma Li, Zuo Zheyu
Institute of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture in South China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China
Abstract:
The high quality development of agriculture is the overall goal of realizing the strategy of quality agriculture and is an important measure to implement rural revitalization. On the basis of systematically explaining the connotation of high quality development of agriculture, this paper constructed agricultural high quality evaluation indicators with 23 indicators of seven dimensions: product quality, industrial efficiency, production efficiency, managerial quality, international competitiveness, farmers′ income and green development. Based on the inter provincial data of 2016, the high quality development of China′s agriculture was analyzed. The results showed that except for Shanghai, Shandong and Tianjin, the overall level of high quality development of agriculture in China was low, and there were significant regional differences, and the overall trend was high in the east and low in the west. Shanghai had the highest comprehensive score and Shanxi had the lowest comprehensive score. There were obvious regional disparities in product quality, industrial efficiency and international competitiveness among the provinces, but there were no significant differences in the dimensions of quality, production efficiency, farmers′ income and green development level. The high quality development of agriculture in China was positively correlated with the level of economic development and urbanization development. Secondly, the increase of human capital and agricultural investment will effectively improve the level of high quality development of agriculture in China. However, the impact of agricultural resources endowment was not significant. In order to improve the level of high quality development of agriculture in China, the following suggestions are put forward: giving full play to the leading effect of modern agricultural parks; playing the comparative advantages of regional agriculture and improving the international competitiveness of agricultural products; taking effective measures to improve the cultural quality of farmers; and strengthening the construction of agricultural socialized service system to enhance the efficiency of regional agricultural production.
Key words:  high quality development of agriculture  index system  comprehensive assessment  regional differences
版权所有:  您是本站第    位访问者
主管单位:中华人民共和国农业农村部 主办单位:中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所
中国农业绿色发展研究会 地址:北京市海淀区中关村南大街12号
电话:010-82109628、82109647 电子邮件:quhuabjb@caas.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备11039015号