摘要: |
目的 新一轮农地确权背景下我国部分农村仍旧坚守农地调整传统,与国家地权稳定的政策目标反向而行,探讨农户农地调整意愿影响因素对农地确权政策在调地村庄真正落实意义重大。方法 文章基于农户分化视角,采用二元Logistic模型探讨情理因素和法理因素对农户农地调整意愿的影响。结果 (1)无论是否控制农户资源禀赋特征,情理因素均对农户调地意愿具有显著正向影响;(2)未控制农户资源禀赋特征时,法理因素显著负向影响农户调地意愿,而控制农户资源禀赋特征后,法理因素对其调地意愿的影响并不显著。(3)法理因素在情理因素与农户调地意愿之间起着负向调节作用。(4)情理与法理对不同类型农户调地意愿的影响存在差异。结论 为进一步减少农地调整频次,促进农地确权最终取代农地调整,推进农地调整减频替代,在强化法理对调地意愿抑制作用的同时也要弱化情理对其激励作用,针对不同类型农户采取差别化调地意愿降低策略,进一步深化以地权稳定为目标的农地确权。 |
关键词: 情理 法理 农地确权 资源禀赋 地权稳定 |
DOI:10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20230522 |
分类号:F321.1 |
基金项目:国家自然科学基金面项目“基于可持续生计框架的长江流域禁捕补偿政策绩效评估和优化研究”(721730784);上海市哲学社会科学规划一般课题“长江大保护背景下禁捕补偿制度及退捕渔民生计研究”(2019BQL011) |
|
EQUITY AND LAW ABIDING: A STUDY ON WILLINGNESS TO ADJUST FARMLAND FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF FARMERS' DIFFERENTIATION |
Chen Tinggui, Li Yanping
|
School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
|
Abstract: |
Under the background of the new round of farmland rights confirmation, some rural areas in China still adhere to the tradition of farmland adjustment, which is contrary to the policy goal of national farmland rights stability. Exploring the influencing factors of farmers' willingness to adjust farmland is of great significance to the implementation of farmland rights confirmation policy in the study areas. Based on the perspective of farmers' differentiation, this paper used binary logistic model to focus on the impact of equitable and legal factors on farmers' willingness to adjust farmland. The results showed that farmers' willingness to adjust farmland was affected by both equity and law abiding in the whole sample. (1)Whether the characteristics of farmers' resource endowment were controlled or not, equitable factors had a significant positive impact on farmers' willingness to adjust farmland; (2) Without controlling the characteristics of farmers' resource endowment, the legal factors had a significant negative impact on farmers' willingness to adjust farmland, while after controlling the characteristics of farmers' resource endowment, the legal factors had no significant impact on farmers' willingness to adjust farmland. (3)The legal factors played a negative regulatory role between equitable factors and farmers' willingness to adjust farmland. (4)Equity and law abiding had different effects on the willingness of different types of farmers to adjust farmland: equity had a significant positive impact on the willingness of all types of farmers to adjust farmland. Therefore, in order to further reduce the frequency of farmland adjustment and promote the confirmation of farmland rights to finally replace farmland adjustment, it is important to strengthen the inhibitory effect of legal factors on the willingness to adjust farmland, meanwhile weaken the incentive effect of equitable factors, adopt different strategies to reduce farmland adjustment willingness for different types of farmers. |
Key words: equity law abiding confirmation of farmland rights resource endowment stability of farmland rights |