| 摘要: |
| 目的 揭示不同模式土地整治对农户生态生产行为的作用机理及其影响效应，探求实现农业可持续发展和生态健康的新路径。方法 文章构建“土地整治—农地细碎化—农户生态生产行为”逻辑框架，基于湖北省天门市、潜江市、咸丰县、宣恩县483份农户调查的面板数据，运用双重差分模型分析不同模式土地整治对农户生态生产行为的影响差异。结果 （1）土地整治通过治理农地细碎化，推动农业规模经营与机械发展，有效降低农户单位面积化肥、农药的投入，有助于塑造农户生态生产行为。（2）与政府主导模式相比，新农主导模式以现代农业发展为导向，充分发挥农户的主体作用，强化土地整治与农地流转的耦合关联，更有利于改善农地细碎化程度，对农户生态生产行为的促进效果也更为明显。结论 应将农地细碎化治理作为土地整治的核心内容，在巩固和完善政府主导模式的同时，加大新农主导模式的支持力度，增强农户生态保护与社会责任分担意识，不断推进土地整治模式的创新发展，充分发挥土地整治在塑造农户生态生产行为、实现农业农村可持续发展、构建生态健康保障体系的重要作用。 |
| 关键词: 土地整治 不同模式 农地细碎化 农户生态生产行为 双重差分模型 |
| DOI：10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20240101 |
| 分类号:F301.2 |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年项目“土地整治多功能融合对农户可持续生计的影响机理研究”（71904150）；湖北省教育厅哲学社会科学研究一般项目“土地综合整治对农民收入的影响机理与增收路径研究”（20Y056） |
|
| DIFFERENT MODES OF LAND CONSOLIDATION, FARMLAND FRAGMENTATION AND FARMERS' ECOLOGICAL PRODUCTION BEHAVIOR* ——TAKING THE APPLICATION OF PESTICIDES ANDFERTILIZERS AS EXAMPLES |
|
Wu Shiman1,2, Zhu Hao1, Lu Xinhai2, Zhang Chaozheng3, Zhao Jinghui4, Meng Shengxiang1
|
|
1.School of Management,Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, Hubei, China;2.School of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China;3.College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China;4.Institute of Land and National Development, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, China
|
| Abstract: |
| This research aims to reveal the effect of different modes of land consolidation on farmers' ecological production behavior, and explore new ways of the sustainable agricultural production and ecological health. Based on the framework of "land consolidation-farmland fragmentation-farmers' ecological production behavior", and the panel data of 483 household surveys in Tianmen, Qianjiang, Xianfeng and Xuanen counties in Hubei province, the difference-in-differences model was embraced to analyze the effect of different land consolidation modes on farmers' ecological production behavior. The results were showed as follows. (1) Land consolidation promoted large-scale agricultural operation and mechanization by reducing the degree of cultivated land fragmentation, and effectively decreased the input of chemical fertilizers and pesticides per unit area. Thus, it could help shape farmers' ecological production behavior. (2) Compared with the government-led mode, the market-led mode took the development of modern agriculture as the guidance, gave full play to the main role of farmers, and strengthened the coupling linkage between land consolidation and farmland transfer. So, the market-led model was more conducive to improving the degree of farmland fragmentation and had a more obvious effect on promoting the ecological production behavior of farmers. Therefore, it is necessary to take the reduction of farmland fragmentation as the core of land consolidation. While consolidating and improving the government-led model, we should increase the support for the market-led model. And we should also strengthen farmers' awareness of ecological protection and social responsibility, and constantly promote the mode innovation of land consolidation. In addition, we can give full play to the important role of land consolidation in shaping the ecological production behavior of farmers, realizing sustainable agricultural development, and building an ecological health security system. |
| Key words: land consolidation different modes farmland fragmentation farmers' ecological production behavior difference-in-differences model |
