| 摘要: |
| 目的 绿色生产是有效遏制农牧业面源污染，推进农牧业绿色发展，实现农牧业农村牧区现代化的关键。方法 文章基于内蒙古半农半牧区444户农牧户的实地调研数据，从生计资本水平和结构的双重视角，在可持续生计分析框架和代际差异理论的基础上，通过熵权-TOPSIS法综合评价农牧户生计资本总水平和各维度生计资本水平并划分农牧户生计资本结构，运用有序Probit模型实证分析了生计资本对农牧户绿色生产行为的影响，揭示了不同代际农牧户绿色生产行为的差异，并对结果的稳健性展开探讨。结果 （1）生计资本水平分析中，农牧户生计资本总水平、人力资本水平、自然资本水平、金融资本水平均显著正向影响农牧户绿色生产行为。（2）生计资本结构分析中，人力资本占优型、自然资本占优、金融资本占优和社会资本占优均显著正向影响农牧户绿色生产行为。（3）代际差异分析中，生计资本水平与结构对农牧户绿色生产行为方面存在明显的代际差异。结论 据此，提出了提高生计资本水平、优化生计资本结构以及重视代际差异的政策建议。 |
| 关键词: 生计资本 农牧户绿色生产行为 内蒙古半农半牧区 有序Probit模型 |
| DOI：10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20250303 |
| 分类号:F327.8 |
| 基金项目:国家社会科学基金西部项目“后扶贫时代少数民族半农半牧区生态宜居与农牧民可持续生计耦合研究”（19XMZ084）；2024年度高校基本科研业务费项目（科研培育与全员育人专项）“偏向性减排目标约束下城市环境协同治理及优化路径研究”（2722024DK007） |
|
| EFFECTS OF LIVELIHOOD CAPITAL ON GREEN PRODUCTION BEHAVIOR OF FARMERS AND HERDSMEN——BASED ON THE SURVEY DATA OF FARMERS AND HERDSMEN IN SEMI-AGRICULTURAL AND SEMI -PASTORAL AREAS OF INNER MONGOLIA |
|
A Runa1, Gao Honggui1, Jin Liang2
|
|
1.School of Economics, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, Hubei, China;2.Ordos Institute of Technology, Ordos 017000, Inner Mongolia, China
|
| Abstract: |
| Green production is the key to effectively curb the non-point source pollution of agriculture and animal husbandry, promote the green development of agriculture and animal husbandry, and realize the modernization of agriculture and animal husbandry rural areas. Based on field survey data from 444 farming and herding households in semi-farming and semi-herding areas of Inner Mongolia, this paper comprehensively evaluated the livelihood capital level and structure of these households. It employed a sustainable livelihood analysis framework, intergenerational difference theory, and the entropy weight-TOPSIS method to assess the total level of livelihood capital as well as each dimension. Additionally, the ordered Probit model was used to empirically analyze the impact of livelihood capital on farmers' and herdsmen's green production behavior, revealing generational differences in such behavior. The findings are as follows: (1) Livelihood capital levels including human capital, natural capital, and financial capital had significant positive effects on green production behavior. (2) Dominance in human capital, natural capital, financial capital, or social capital also significantly positively affected green production behavior. (3) Intergenerational differences exist in both the level and structure of livelihood capitals' influence on green production behavior. Based on these analyses, policy suggestions are proposed to enhance livelihood capitals' levels, optimize their structures while considering intergenerational differences. |
| Key words: livelihood capital green production behavior of farmers and herdsmen Inner Mongolia semi-agricultural and semi-pastoral area ordered Probit model |
