| 摘要: |
| 目的 探究农地城市流转效率对农民收入的影响效应及其空间溢出边界。方法 文章以要素配置理论为基础，结合空间溢出相关理论，运用随机前沿生产函数模型、空间杜宾模型分析了2010—2021年长江经济带中下游77个地级及以上城市的农地城市流转效率对农民收入的影响效应及其空间溢出边界。结果 （1）2010—2021年长江经济带中下游的农地城市流转效率和农民收入在时间上整体呈现逐年上升趋势；空间上二者均呈现较为显著的空间关联格局和空间依赖特征。（2）要素流动过程中劳动力及其与土地要素的交互作用、资本与土地要素的交互作用通过影响前沿产出间接影响农地城市流转效率和农民收入。（3）农地城市流转效率对农民收入的影响存在负向直接效应和正向间接效应，影响效应呈现不同方向可能归因于不同城市辖区内农民原有生活条件与就业形式的差异。（4）农地城市流转效率对农民收入影响的空间溢出的地理范围边界在63.2~65.2 km，溢出强度呈现随地理距离增加而逐渐衰减的特征。结论 应分别从劳动力流动、资本配置、土地配置的视角出发，设计能够同时促进农民增收和农地向城市高效流转的“双轮驱动”的“强农惠农富农式”城市化发展策略。 |
| 关键词: 农地城市流转效率 农民收入 直接效应 间接效应 空间溢出边界 |
| DOI：10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20260513 |
| 分类号:F299.22;F321.1 |
| 基金项目:教育部人文社科基金规划项目“双碳目标下城乡土地转换的价值增值与碳排放效应及调控政策研究——以武汉城市圈为例”（22YJA790065）；国家社科基金重大项目“长江经济带耕地保护生态补偿机制构建与政策创新研究”（18ZDA054）；国家自然科学基金“集体经营性建设用地市场主体一体化行为对市场效率作用机制及其效率改进政策研究”（72273048）；国家社会科学基金“城乡统一建设用地市场价值增值机理及收益分配关系研究”（22FJYB041）；中央高校基本业务费基金“土地转换的碳效应与区域高质量协同机制研究——武汉城市圈的实证分析”（2662022GGYJ004） |
|
| THE IMPACT OF RURAL-URBAN LAND CONVERSION EFFICIENCY ON FARMERS’ INCOME AND ITS SPATIAL SPILLOVER BOUNDARY |
|
Fang Xinqi1,2, Wen Lanjiao2,3, Zhang Anlu2,3, Wu Yuzhe1
|
|
1School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, China;2School of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China;3Research Center for Natural Resources Management and Global Governance, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
|
| Abstract: |
| The aim of this study is to explore the impact of rural-urban land conversion efficiency (LUE) on farmers' income and its spatial spillover boundary. Combining factor allocation theory and spatial spillover theory, we employed the Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) model and the Spatial Durbin Model (SDM) to analyze the impact of LUE on farmers' income and its spatial spillover boundary with panel data from 77 cities in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt (2010—2021). The results showed that: (1) Temporally, both LUE and farmers' income exhibited sustained growth from 2010 to 2021; Spatially, they displayed significant correlation patterns. (2) Labor allocation and its interaction with land, as well as capital-land interactions, indirectly influenced LUE and farmers' income by altering frontier output. (3) LUE had a dual effect on farmers' income: A direct negative impact but a positive indirect spillover effect, attributable to disparities in farmers' baseline living conditions and employment structures across regions. (4) The spatial spillover effect decayed within a boundary of 63.2km~65.2 km, with intensity declining over distance. Therefore, policymakers should adopt an integrated urbanization strategy centered on "Strengthening Agriculture, Benefiting Farmers, and Raising Rural Living Standards" to simultaneously boost farmers' income and LUE. This requires optimizing labor mobility, capital allocation, and land-use planning while accounting for spatial spillover dynamics. |
| Key words: rural-urban land conversion efficiency farmers' income direct effect indirect effect spatial spillover boundary |
