• 首页 | 主办单位 | 期刊简介 | 编委会 | 作者指南 | 刊物订阅 | 下载中心 | 联系我们 | English | 期刊界
引用本文:姜思琪.乡村振兴战略下内蒙古农村发展水平及耦合协调研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2026,47(5):239~247
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 59次   下载 5 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
乡村振兴战略下内蒙古农村发展水平及耦合协调研究
姜思琪
内蒙古民族大学经济学院,通辽 028001
摘要:
目的 量化评估内蒙古农村发展水平和耦合协调程度,为我国西北地区农村发展和“三农”工作开展提供参考。方法 文章基于乡村振兴战略背景,构建内蒙古农村发展指标体系,采用熵值法、综合评价指数法和耦合协调模型对其发展水平和耦合协调度进行量化分析。结果 (1)2013—2022年内蒙古农村发展综合水平增长速度和增长趋势明显,发展水平:社会发展>生活质量>经济发展>资源环境;增长速度:社会发展>经济发展>生活质量,资源环境呈负增长。(2)研究期间,内蒙古农村发展系统耦合度相对较高,除2016年处于拮抗线耦合阶段,其他年份均处于高水平耦合阶段,并以2017年为临界点,前期波动性大,后期趋于稳定;耦合协调度水平较低,一直处于失调阶段,但是整体协调发展趋势由无序状态向有序发展转变。(3)各子系统耦合度和协调度发展差异较大,其中,经济发展和社会发展2个子系统耦合度和耦合协调度发展趋势相似,均由低到高,由严重失调到中度失调,发展趋势良好;生活质量耦合度和协调度整体偏低,基本处于严重失调阶段;资源环境耦合度较高,但是协调度呈下降趋势,由有序向无秩序方向转变。结论 2013—2022年内蒙古农村发展水平逐年提升,农村经济、生活质量、社会发展和资源环境之间相互作用强度大,彼此依赖程度高,但是各要素之间发展极其不平衡,农村劳动力流失,教育和文化事业发展缓慢,传统农业经济模式转型困难,能源利用效率低,生态环境压力大等,资源配置效率不高,城乡发展差异不断加剧等,严重制约了区域农村发展。最后基于文章结论提出相关发展建议。
关键词:  乡村振兴战略  农村发展  耦合协调  “三农”问题  内蒙古
DOI:10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20260519
分类号:F327
基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目“乡村振兴背景下内蒙古农村牧区基础设施供给绩效评价与发展路径研究”(21XMZ068);2022年内蒙古乡村振兴研究基地(东部)项目“乡村振兴战略背景下金融支持内蒙古新型农牧业经营主体发展问题研究”(22XCZXJDY07)
THE DEVELOPMENT LEVEL AND COUPLING COORDINATION OF RURAL AREAS IN INNER MONGOLIA UNDER THE RURAL REVITALIZATION STRATEGY
Jiang Siqi
Shool of Economices, Inner Mongolia Minzu University, Tongliao 028001, Inner Mongolia, China
Abstract:
This research aims to quantitatively evaluate the level of rural development and coupling coordination in Inner Mongolia, so as to offer implications for rural advancement and the development of agriculture, rural areas and farmers in Northwest China. Against the backdrop of the rural revitalization strategy, an indicator system for rural development in Inner Mongolia was constructed, and the entropy method, comprehensive evaluation index method, and coupling coordination model were used to quantitatively analyze its development level and coupling coordination degree. The results found that: (1) From 2013 to 2022, the comprehensive level of rural development in Inner Mongolia showed a significant growth rate and trend, with the development level being: social development>quality of life>economic development>resources and environment; Growth rate: social development>economic development>quality of life, and resources and environment showed negative growth. (2) The coupling degree was in a high-level coupling stage except for 2016 when it was in the antagonistic line coupling stage, with 2017 as the critical point. The early volatility was high, and it tended to stabilize in the later stage, showing a stable development trend; The level of coupling coordination was relatively low and was basically in the stage of imbalance. (3) The coupling and coordination degrees varied considerably across subsystems. The economic development and social development subsystems displayed similar trends in both coupling degree and coupling coordination: both had risen from low to high levels, shifting from serious imbalance to moderate imbalance, indicating a sound development process. By contrast, the coupling and coordination degrees for the quality-of-life subsystem remained overall low, staying largely in the serious imbalance category. The resource-environment subsystem maintained a relatively high coupling degree, but its coordination degree had been declining, evolving from an orderly state toward disorder. Therefore, from 2013 to 2022, the development level of rural areas in Inner Mongolia has been improving year by year. The interaction between rural economy, quality of life, social development, and resource environment is strong and highly dependent on each other. However, the development of various factors is extremely unbalanced, rural labor force is lost, education and cultural development are slow, traditional agricultural economic models are difficult to transform, energy utilization efficiency is low, ecological environment pressure is high, resource allocation efficiency is low, and urban-rural development differences continue to intensify, which seriously restricts regional rural development. Finally, relevant development suggestions are proposed based on the conclusion of the research.
Key words:  rural revitalization strategy  rural development  coupling coordination  the issue of agriculture, rural areas and farmers  Inner Mongolia
版权所有:  您是本站第    位访问者
主管单位:中华人民共和国农业农村部 主办单位:中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所
中国农业绿色发展研究会 地址:北京市海淀区中关村南大街12号
电话:010-82109628、82109647 电子邮件:quhuabjb@caas.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备11039015号