| 摘要: |
| 目的 通过探讨社会资本、人力资本、资金资本、物质资本4种常见生计资本及失地农民因征地补偿所特有的自然资本补偿对失地农户生计可持续性直接影响路径和间接影响途径，以期为其他生计研究及政府决策提供参考。方法 文章基于甘肃省兰州市安宁区入户调查数据，采用熵值法从失地农户家庭年人均可支配收入、生计多样性、保险覆盖率及家庭劳动力就业率4个角度构建失地农民可持续生计评价体系，并运用结构方程模型中路径分析方法，定量分析生计资本对被失地农户可持续生计影响机理。结果 （1）人力资本、自然资本补偿和资金资本是主要直接驱动因素，对安宁区失地农户生计可持续性存在显著的正向直接影响；（2）物质资本和社会资本主要通过间接路径对可持续生计产生有限的影响；（3）人力资本、自然资本补偿与其他3种生计资本之间存在多种内在影响，最终通过资金资本对生计产生的间接效应。结论 针对失地农户的可持续生计分析，应使用自然资本补偿替代自然资本，5项生计资本对于该群体生计可持续性影响在程度以及驱动路径上存在显著差异。 |
| 关键词: 失地农户 可持续生计 路径分析 结构方程模型 欠发达地区 |
| DOI：10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20210416 |
| 分类号:F062.2 |
| 基金项目:国家社科基金 “精准扶贫政策对西部贫困地区农户可持续生计的影响研究”（17BJY133）;甘肃省社科规划项目“甘肃省少数民族地区城镇化发展进程研究——基于内部耦合的视角”（YB 111）；兰州城市学院青年教师科研资助项目“西部欠发达地区城市新区失地农民市民化问题研究”（LZCU-QN2018-18） |
|
| STUDY ON THE INFLUENCE MECHANISM OF SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS BASED ON STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODEL*——A CASE STUDY OF ANNING DISTRICT IN LANZHOU CITY |
|
Yang Kun1,2,3, Hou Qingfeng1,2,3, Liu Pengfei1
|
|
1.Business School, Lanzhou City University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China;2.Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000,Gansu, China;3.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
|
| Abstract: |
| This paper discusses the direct and indirect influence of natural capital compensation, social capital, human capital, financial capital and material capital on the livelihood sustainability of landless peasants, in order to provide reference for other livelihood research and government adaptation policies. Based on the survey data of Lanzhou Anning district, the influence mechanism of livelihood capital on the sustainable livelihood for landless peasants was quantitatively analyzed by using the path analysis method with the structural equation model. The results showed that: (1) Human capital, natural capital compensation and financial capital were the main direct driving factors, which had significant positive direct effects on the livelihood sustainability for the landless peasants in Anning district. (2) The material capital and social capital had limited impacts on the sustainable livelihoods through the indirect path; (3) There were many internal effects between human capital, natural capital compensation and the other three kinds of livelihood capital, and finally had the indirect effect through financial capital on livelihood. Therefore, in the sustainable livelihood analysis of landless peasants, natural capital compensation should be used to replace natural capital, while the impact of five livelihood capitals on the sustainability are significant difference in degree or the drive path. |
| Key words: landless peasants sustainable livelihood path analysis structural equation modeling underdeveloped areas |
