• 首页 | 主办单位 | 期刊简介 | 编委会 | 作者指南 | 刊物订阅 | 下载中心 | 联系我们 | English | 期刊界
引用本文:何如海,薛中俊,汪玉芳,侯雪迪,胡宏祥.油菜秸秆还田及化肥配施的水稻经济环境效益分析[J].中国农业资源与区划,2021,42(6):42~49
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 842次   下载 383 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
油菜秸秆还田及化肥配施的水稻经济环境效益分析
何如海1,薛中俊2,汪玉芳1,侯雪迪2,胡宏祥2
1.安徽农业大学经济技术学院,合肥 230036;2.安徽农业大学资源与环境学院,合肥 230036
摘要:
目的 为提高秸秆还田的效率和综合效益,探讨秸秆还田及化肥配施对水稻的经济和生态环境的影响。方法 文章设置了无秸秆不施肥(CK)、秸秆全量覆土还田不施肥(S)、无秸秆常规施肥(F)、秸秆全量覆土还田+常规施肥(SF)、秸秆全量覆土还田+常规施肥减15%(SDF)5个处理进行田间小区试验,研究其经济环境效益。结果 在经济效益方面,秸秆还田+常规施肥(SF)产量最高,与无秸秆常规施肥(F)相比,增产了2.28%,纯收益增加1.52%,秸秆还田对经济效益有促进作用。在环境效益方面,与无秸秆常规施肥(F)相比,秸秆全量覆土还田+常规施肥(SF)和秸秆全量覆土还田+常规施肥减15%(SDF)显著降低总氮(TN)径流流失总量10.75%和28.67%,总磷(TP)径流流失总量分别降低1.45%和2.90%。结论 综合经济环境效益得出,在常规施肥条件下,秸秆还田可以实现作物增产增收,农田径流氮磷流失减少,化肥投入品减量。
关键词:  秸秆还田  化肥配施  氮磷流失  经济效益  环境效益
DOI:10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20210606
分类号:F303.4;X37
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目“长江下游农业面源和重金属污染防控技术示范”(2016YFD0801105)
ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF RICE WITH THE APPLICATION OF RAPESEED STRAW AND CHEMICAL FERTILIZER
He Ruhai1, Xue Zhongjun2, Wang Yufang1, Hou Xuedi2, Hu Hongxiang2
1.College of Economics and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, Anhui, China;2.College of Resources and Environment, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, Anhui, China
Abstract:
In order to improve the efficiency and comprehensive benefits of straw returning, this study focuses on the effects of straw returning and chemical fertilizer on the economic and ecological environment of rice. The field experiment was statistically arranged with five treatments and triplicates as follows, no straw and no fertilization (CK), full straw returning and no fertilization (S), non-straw conventional fertilization (F), full straw returning + conventional fertilization (SF) and full straw returning + conventional fertilization 15% reduction (SDF). We studied the economic and environmental benefits of different straw returning and fertilizer application by plot experiment. The results were listed as follows. In terms of economic benefits, the yield of rice was the highest when the full straw was returned to field+ conventional fertilization (SF) treatment. Compared with conventional fertilization (F), the yield increased by 2.28%, and the net income increased by 1.52%, respectively. In terms of environmental benefits, compared with conventional fertilization (F), full straw returning + conventional fertilization (SF) and full straw returning + conventional fertilization 15% reduction (SDF) significantly reduced total nitrogen (TN) runoff loss by 10.75% and 28.67%, and total phosphorus (TP) runoff loss by 1.45% and 2.90%, respectively. In summary, according to the comprehensive economic and environmental benefits, straw returning can increase crop yield and income and reduce nitrogen and phosphorus loss in farmland runoff, as well as reduce the amount of fertilizer input and alleviate the potential threat of chemical fertilizer input to the environment.
Key words:  straw returning  fertilizer application  loss of nitrogen and phosphorus  economic benefits  environmental benefits
版权所有:  您是本站第    位访问者
主管单位:中华人民共和国农业农村部 主办单位:中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所
中国农业绿色发展研究会 地址:北京市海淀区中关村南大街12号
电话:010-82109628、82109647 电子邮件:quhuabjb@caas.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备11039015号