基于文献计量分析的国内外空间规划研究比较

COMPARISON OF SPATIAL PLANNING RESEARCH AT HOME AND ABROAD BASED ON BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

关键词:  空间规划  国内外  比较  文献计量  知识图谱

Key words:  spatial planning  at home and abroad  comparison  bibliometric analysis  knowledge maps

摘要:

目的 生态文明背景下，科学制定国土空间规划和完善空间治理体系，对统筹好资源环境保护与空间开发以及经济发展具有重要现实意义。方法 文章运用文献计量分析和可视化的知识图谱分析方法，以“空间规划”为主题进行文献检索，对2000年以后国内外有关空间规划的相关期刊文献集进行多角度的可视化分析。结果 （1）2000—2020年国内外有关空间规划研究的文献量都呈现逐年上升的趋势，但在研究机构之间的合作强度上均有待加强；（2）我国有关空间规划的研究论文发表的期刊虽多，但是发文期刊仍然集中在城市规划领域，国外有关空间规划的论文发表所涉及的期刊类型则更为丰富；（3）共词分析发现，国内外在空间规划研究领域中，某些研究方向的成果，如“多规合一”等，集中在少数研究学者之中；（4）聚类分析发现，国外有关空间规划的研究在2020年之前明显处于大量工具的开发阶段，而我国有关空间规划的研究则处于最初的概念形成转向大量工具开发的过渡阶段；（5）研究前沿辨析发现，国外有关空间规划研究已经延伸到不同的学科，较早考虑到了环境问题，技术问题也得到特别的关注，而中国的研究则呈现明显的时间阶段，所关注的热点问题不断变化，并且缺少不同学科间的交融研究。结论 中国今后空间规划的研究对象将更为丰富，内涵与外延将得到不断的扩展细化，生态问题既是空间规划研究的重点也是未来研究的趋势。

Abstract:

In the context of ecological civilization, scientific formulation of spatial planning and improvement of space governance system are of great practical significance for coordinating resource and environmental protection with spatial development and economic development. In this study, the bibliometrics analysis and visual knowledge graph analysis methods were adopted to carry out literature retrieval on the topic of "spatial planning" and multi-angle visualization analysis on the collection of periodicals related to spatial planning at home and abroad since 2000. Results were listed as follows. (1) The amount of literature on spatial planning at home and abroad continuously increased during the period studied, but the intensity of institutional cooperation should be strengthened. (2) Although there were many journals concerning spatial planning published in China, the published journals were still concentrated in the field of urban planning, whereas the journals about spatial planning published in foreign countries were more diversified. (3) Co-word analysis showed that in the research field of spatial planning, some research results, such as "multi-plan integration", were concentrated in a small number of researchers. (4) Clustering analysis revealed that the literature on spatial planning in foreign countries was obviously in the tool building stage before 2020, while the research on spatial planning in China was in the transition stage from the initial conceptualization stage to the tool building stage. (5) Research frontier discrimination showed that research on spatial planning in foreign countries had been extended to different disciplines, environmental issues had been taken into account earlier, and technical issues had also attracted special attention. However, the researches in China showed an obvious time stage, the hot issues concerned were constantly changing, and there was a lack of integration between different disciplines. In conclusion, the research object of China's spatial planning will be more abundant, and the connotation and extension will be continuously expanded and refined in the future study. Moreover, ecological issues are not only the focus of spatial planning research, but also the trend of future research.