草原生态补奖对牧户草地流转行为的影响研究——以青海省河南蒙古族自治县为例

RESEARCH ON THE INFLUENCE OF GRASSLANDE COLOGICAL COMPENSATION ON GRASSLAND CIRCULATION BEHAVIOR OF HERDSMAN HOUSEHOLD——TAKING HENAN MONGOLIAN AUTONOMOUS COUNTY IN QINGHAI PROVINCE AS AN EXAMPLE

关键词:  草原生态补奖  生计多样化  草地流转  牧户  影响研究

Key words:  grassland ecological compensation  livelihood diversification  grassland circulation  herdsman household  impact research

摘要:

目的 为进一步推动草原地区牧业可持续发展，丰富草原生态补奖在牧户草地流转行为方面的研究，从而为促进牧户进行草地流转实现规模经营最大化提供理论依据。方法 文章基于青海省河南蒙古族自治县牧户调研数据，运用二元Logit模型分析草原生态补奖对牧户草地流转行为的影响，并借助逐步回归法检验牧户生计多样化在草原生态补奖与草地流转之间的中介作用。结果 研究结果表明：牧户贷款行为、草地现有承包面积以及牧业收入分别在10%、1%与5%显著性水平下对牧户草地流转行为产生正向促进作用，而奖补收入与工资性收入均在10%显著性水平下对牧户草地流转行为产生显著抑制作用；牧户生计多样化在草原生态补奖与草地流转之间存在遮掩效应，遮掩效应占直接效应的比例为34.55%。结论 奖补收入越高，并不一定能够促进牧户草地流转行为，并且牧户生计多样化在一定程度上会增大该抑制作用。

Abstract:

This research aims to further promote the sustainable development of animal husbandry in the grassland area and enrich the research on the grassland ecological compensation award in the grassland circulation behavior of herdsmen, so as to provide theoretical basis for promoting the transfer of grassland to maximize the scale management.Based on the survey data of herdsmen in Henan Mongolian Autonomous County of Qinghai province, a Binary Logit model was used to analyze the effect of grassland ecological compensation on herdsmen's grassland transfer behavior, and a stepwise regression was used to test the mediating effect of livelihood diversification between grassland ecological compensation and grassland transfer.The results showed that the loan behavior of herdsmen, the existing contracted area of grasslands, and the income from animal husbandry had a positive promoting effect on their grassland circulation behavior at the 10%, 1%, and 5% significance levels, respectively, while both bonus income and wage income had a significant inhibitory effect on their grassland circulation behavior at the 10% significance level, and there was a masking effect between grassland ecological compensation and grassland circulation in the diversification of pastoral livelihoods, with the masking effect accounting for 34.55% of the direct effect. In summary, the higher the reward and subsidy income, it does not necessarily promote the grassland transfer behavior, and the diversification of livelihood will increase the inhibitory effect to some extent.