| 摘要: |
| 目的 乡村振兴对助力中国特色社会主义现代化强国建设意义重大。通过对乡村振兴已有研究回顾梳理，从文献特征、演进路径、主题热点等方面进行分析，进而展望未来的发展趋势，为进一步推动乡村振兴提供理论指导和实践借鉴。方法 文章将2007—2022年中国知网（CNKI）期刊中文数据库发表的以“乡村振兴”为主题的3 532篇论文作为样本，借助科学计量分析工具CiteSpace软件，对中国乡村振兴研究主题脉络和研究热点进行全面剖析。结果 （1）乡村振兴文献数量呈现上升趋势，研究历程可以分为起始发展期和蓬勃发展期2个阶段，核心研究机构之间存在一定的合作交流，但学者和研究机构之间的合作强度不大，尚未形成联系紧密的学术共同体和高产作者集群。（2）已有研究主要集中在脱贫攻坚与乡村振兴的有效衔接、乡村治理体系的转型与创新、乡村产业的融合发展、乡村振兴与精准扶贫联动发展机制等方面。（3）关键词聚类呈现出4个核心主题，包括乡村振兴的科学内涵、发展模式、成效测度和发展对策。结论 完善乡村振兴理论体系构建、促进乡村振兴发展模式改革创新、精准测度乡村振兴成效、共助乡村振兴持续高速发展是未来乡村振兴的重要研究方向。 |
| 关键词: 乡村振兴 热点演进 研究展望 文献计量 CiteSpace |
| DOI：10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20231216 |
| 分类号:F323 |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目“动态网络视角下城市老旧社区韧性治理的形成机理、时空测度及智能提升研究”（72104233）；国家“十三五”重点研发计划“绿色宜居村镇工程管理与监督模式”（2018YFD1100202）；教育部人文社科项目“资本视角下中国城市社区适灾韧性提升路径研究”（21YJC630017） |
|
| REVIEW AND PROSPECT OF THE RESEARCH ON THE RURAL REVITALIZATION IN CHINA |
|
Gu Tiantian1, Dai Yanan1, Che Ruiyu1, Du Peipei1, Deng Yongliang2, Cui Peng3
|
|
1.School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China;2.School of Civil Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, Jiangsu, China;3.School of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, Jiangsu, China
|
| Abstract: |
| The promotion of rural revitalization plays a crucial role in advancing the modernization of socialism with Chinese characteristics. From the aspects such as literature characteristics, evolutionary trajectories, and thematic focal points, this paper conducts a retrospective review of existing research on rural revitalization. It forecasts future trends in rural revitalization and thus provide theoretical guidance and practical references for further efforts in this domain. A comprehensive analysis was conducted on a sample of 3 532 journal articles published in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) from 2007 to 2022. The selected articles focused on the theme of ‘rural revitalization’ were analyzed by using the scientific bibliometric analysis tool CiteSpace. The findings revealed an upward trend in the quantity of publications on rural revitalization. The research process could be divided into two phases: the initial development phase and the subsequent vigorous development phase. It had been observed a certain degree of collaboration and communication among core research institutions, however limited to singular sorts of organizations. The level of cooperation between scholars and research institutions was observed to be fairly low, and a strongly interconnected academic community and a high-productivity author concentration had not yet formed. Furthermore, existing research on rural revitalization predominantly centered on the effective connection between poverty alleviation and rural revitalization, the transformation and innovation of rural governance systems, the integrated development of rural industries, and the coordinated development mechanism between rural revitalization and targeted poverty alleviation. The findings additionally demonstrated that keyword clustering presents four core themes, including the scientific connotation of rural revitalization, development models, effectiveness measurement, and development strategies. Therefore, the future research on rural revitalization will primarily concentrate on improving the theoretical framework of rural revitalization, promoting reform and innovation in the development model of rural revitalization, accurately evaluating the effectiveness of rural revitalization, and facilitating the continuous and rapid advancement of rural revitalization through collaboration. |
| Key words: rural revitalization hotspot evolution research prospect bibliometrics Citespace |
