摘要: |
目的 探讨我国猪价波动治理的制度经验是猪价波动治理的重要短期经验支撑,也是建立生猪产业长效性支持政策的长期经验依据。文章探索了我国猪价波动治理的制度经验,并总结制度演变的内在逻辑。方法 对历史资料进行梳理,总结猪价波动治理的制度经验与制度演变逻辑。结果 我国猪价波动治理制度建设历经制度探索期(1985—2006年)、制度建设期(2007—2013年)和制度丰富与完善时期(2014年至今)后,现已逐步建立起相对完善的猪价波动治理制度体系。从制度演变逻辑来看,我国从稳价和稳产两个维度建设猪价波动治理体系。其中稳价类制度建设注重生猪市场自由和有为政府的平衡;稳产类制度遵循保障组织模式发展和金融制度供给两手抓的制度建设逻辑。结论 猪价波动治理要平衡好生猪市场自由与有为政府、协同推动组织模式和金融工具的应用以及推动金融工具的深度应用。 |
关键词: 猪价波动 稳价制度 稳产制度 组织模式 金融工具 |
DOI:10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20250108 |
分类号:F323.7;F326.3 |
基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目“中国生猪种质资源继承保护、创新开发与惠益分享研究”(22BJY084),教育部人文社科项目“中国生猪遗传资源保护与利用研究:组织、效率与创新”(21YJA790053),黑龙江省经济社会发展重点项目“玉米种质资源保护利用体系中的继承与创新机制研究”(22560);重庆市“重庆英才计划”包干制项目“生猪产业安全边界识别、驱动因素和升级路径研究”(2021YC002),海南省热带作物信息技术应用研究重点实验室2023年度开放基金项目“基于育种基地的地方畜禽种质资源保护与利用研究”(ZDSYS-KFJJ-202302) |
|
INSTITUTIONAL EXPERIENCE AND INTERNAL LOGIC IN THE GOVERNANCE OF HOG PRICE VOLATILITY IN CHINA |
Li Chunlei1, Shen Yuzuo2, Wang Gangyi1
|
1.College of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150006, Heilongjiang, China;2.Institute of Science and Technology Information, China Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, Hainan, China
|
Abstract: |
Exploring the institutional experience of China's hog price volatility governance is an important short-term empirical support for hog price volatility governance, as well as a long-term empirical basis for the establishment of long-term support policies for the hog industry. This research aims to explore the institutional experience in the governance of hog price volatility in China and summarize the internal logic of institutional evolution. The study combed the historical data and used normative analysis to summarize the institutional experience of hog price fluctuation governance and the logic of institutional evolution. The results were indicated as follows. After a period of institutional exploration (1985—2006), institutional construction (2007—2013), and institutional enrichment and improvement (2014—present), China had gradually established a relatively perfect system of hog price volatility governance. In terms of system evolution logic, China had built the hog price fluctuation governance system from two dimensions: stable price and stable production. Among them, price stabilization system focused on the balance between free hog market and active government; production stabilization system followed the logic of guaranteeing the development of organizational model and financial system supply. Therefore, balancing the freedom of hog market with an active government, promoting the application of organizational model and financial instruments, and promoting the in-depth application of financial instruments are the important paths to optimize China's hog price volatility governance system. |
Key words: hog price volatility stable price system stable production system organizational model financial instruments |