| 摘要: |
| 目的 农地禀赋差异是影响区域农地流转的农户福利效应不平衡的关键因素，与流转价格和政府参与行为共同影响农户福利，揭示农地禀赋对农户土地流转福利的影响路径，以期为乡村振兴与共同富裕提供决策参考。方法 文章构建有调节的中介模型，运用piecewise SEM实证检验农地禀赋影响农户福利的路径。结果 （1）农地禀赋越高，流转价格越高，且非自发流转模式下流转价格高于自发流转模式，但流转模式在农地禀赋与流转价格间的调节效应不显著。（2）农地禀赋通过流转价格的中介作用间接影响农户福利，并通过流转模式的直接调节效应影响农户福利，非自发流转模式下农地禀赋越高、农户福利越高。结论 研究认为不同农地禀赋条件下农地流转的农户福利效应差异明显，流转模式与流转价格在农地禀赋与农户福利间有调节的中介效应扩大了这一差距，建议适当调控流转价格，并制定差别化政策，激励禀赋较差地区的农地发生流转，同时关注禀赋较差区域农地流转后农户福利的保障与提升。 |
| 关键词: 农地流转 农地禀赋 农户福利效应 有调节的中介模型 piecewise SEM |
| DOI：10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20250315 |
| 分类号:F321.1 |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目“产权制度激励下农户土地流转决策的形成机理、福利效应与政策供给”（71973050）；中央高校基本科研业务费项目“要素市场化配置下农地流转的空间格局、形成机理与供需均衡研究—以武汉城市圈为例”（2662023GGPY003）；国家留学基金委资助（202306760093） |
|
| STUDY ON THE IMPACT PATH OF AGRICULTURAL LAND ENDOWMENT ON THE FARMERS' WELFARE OF LAND TRANSFER |
|
Liu Jianling1,3, Peng Kaili1, Li Shengpeng2, Liu Nannan1
|
|
1.College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China;2.School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China;3.Department of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin 10115, Germany
|
| Abstract: |
| Differences in agricultural land endowment are the primary factor affecting the imbalance of farmer welfare effects in regional land transfer. Together with transfer price and government participation, they jointly influence the improvement of farmers' welfare. There may also be complex interrelationships among these three factors. Conducting path research on these factors is of great significance for rural revitalization and common prosperity. This study constructed a moderated mediation model based on piecewise SEM model to empirically test the path. The results were showed as follows. (1) The higher agricultural land endowment was, the higher transfer price became. And the transfer price was higher in the non-spontaneous transfer mode than that in the farmer-spontaneous transfer mode, but the moderating effect of the flow model between agricultural land endowment and transfer price was not significant. (2) The endowment of agricultural land indirectly affected farmers' welfare through the intermediary role of transfer price, and directly affected farmers' welfare through the direct regulatory effect of transfer modes. Higher agricultural land endowment in the non-spontaneous transfer mode was associated with higher farmers' welfare. Therefore, farmers' welfare effects of land transfer under different conditions of agricultural land endowment are significantly different, since the mediating effect of transfer mode and transfer price between agricultural land and farmers' welfare may widen this gap. It is suggested that differentiated policies should be made to appropriately regulate the transfer prices, encourage land transfer in areas with poor endowment, and focus on ensuring and improving the farmers' welfare in areas with poor endowment. |
| Key words: agricultural land transfer agricultural land endowment farmers' welfare moderated mediating model piecewise SEM |
