农地“三权分置”改革与乡村治理研究——一个“效应—响应”分析框架

STUDY ON THE REFORM OF THE THREE RIGHTS SEPARATION OF FARMLAND AND RURAL GOVERNANCE——A "EFFECT - RESPONSE" ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK

关键词:  农地“三权分置”改革  乡村治理  内在逻辑  “效应—响应”  政治经济学

Key words:  reform of the three rights separation of farmland  rural governance  internal logic  effect—response  political economy

摘要:

目的 构建响应农地“三权分置”改革的乡村治理体系以推进乡村社会稳定和农业农村现代化发展。方法 文章运用政治经济学方法论，全面梳理农地产权安排与乡村治理关系演变的历史变迁以及内在逻辑，并进一步探析农地“三权分置”改革与乡村治理的“效应—响应”关系。结果 （1）农地产权制度安排与乡村治理关系变迁的政治经济学逻辑：农地产权制度改革打破了原有农地产权制度安排与乡村治理的平衡是逻辑起点，乡村治理转型以适应变化了的农地产权制度安排是逻辑过程，农地产权制度安排与乡村治理相互协调是逻辑目标。（2）揭示农地“三权分置”改革的乡村治理效应，具体为农地产权结构的治理结构效应、农地产权实施的治理方式效应、农地产权保护的治理理念效应。（3）从加强巩固农地确权成果的乡村治理组织建设、创新优化资源配置的多元主体协同共治方式、贯彻契合利益秩序的以人民为中心治理理念三个方面构建适应性现代化乡村治理响应路径。结论 解析农地产权与乡村治理的“效应—响应”关系，有利于二者的协调发展，实施“治理有效”的乡村振兴战略。

Abstract:

This research aims to develop a rural governance system that aligns with the reform of the three rights separation of farmland, thereby fostering the stable development of rural society and the modernization of agriculture and rural areas. Utilizing political economy methodology, this study conducted a comprehensive review of the historical evolution and internal logic of the relationship between the arrangement of farmland property rights and rural governance, and further explored the "effect-response" relationship between the reform of the three rights separation of farmland and rural governance. The key findings were listed as follows. (1) The political economy logic of the evolving relationship between the farmland property rights system and rural governance was that the reform of the farmland property rights system serves as the starting point, disrupting the original balance between the system's arrangement and rural governance. The transformation of rural governance was the process, adapting to the new arrangement of farmland property rights. The coordination of the farmland property rights system arrangement with rural governance was the ultimate goal. (2) The paper revealed the effects of the three rights separation reform on rural governance, which included impacts on the governance structure due to the property rights structure, the methods of governance implementation, and the concept of governance in terms of property rights protection. (3) It proposed a modernized adaptive response path for rural governance, focusing on three aspects: strengthening the organizational construction of rural governance to consolidate the outcomes of land rights verification, innovating multi-subject collaborative governance models to optimize resource allocation, and implementing a people-centered governance philosophy that aligned with the order of interests. Therefore, analyzing the "effect-response" relationship between farmland property rights and rural governance is essential for their coordinated development and for the implementation of the "Effective Governance" strategy for rural revitalization.